Pig butchering on Tron: we followed the money from 9,993 victim reports
PublicAML · On-chain investigation · 1 October 2026
Pig-butchering victims rarely see their money again, but many of them do one thing: they publish the address they were told to pay. We took 9,993 public reports from Chainabuse — pig butchering, romance scams and fake-returns platforms, 2022 to September 2026 — pulled out every Tron address in them, 2,197 in all, and read where the USDT went next. The reports are anonymous allegations; the chain is not. On it, money from different victims’ reports keeps arriving at the same few wallets, and leaves through the same exchange deposit accounts.
9,993
Chainabuse reports read: pig butchering, romance, fake returns
2,197
Tron addresses in them; 855 were paid by 10 or more senders
92.7M USDT
through one wallet that 7 reported addresses fed, May–Jul 2025
184
exchange deposit accounts receiving from reported addresses
What we did
Chainabuse is the largest open database of crypto-scam reports. Anyone can file one, usually with the address they paid. We took every report in three categories — pig butchering (1,999; the site’s listing stops near 2,000), romance (1,622) and fake-returns platforms (6,372) — and extracted the Tron addresses. Tron matters because this kind of fraud is overwhelmingly paid in USDT on Tron.
Before reading anything into an address we checked what it is. 38 of the 2,197 are exchange hot wallets that victims listed by mistake — the place they bought USDT, not the place it went. Those are left out. 132 are exchange deposit addresses: the victim was told to pay straight into an exchange account. That account belongs to whoever opened it, which makes it the most useful lead in the whole set — the exchange knows who that is.
For the remaining 2,154 we read the USDT history. 1,895 had activity; 855 received USDT from 10 or more different senders, and 110 from more than 100 — far more than one victim each. Most of those people never filed a report.
Where the reports converge
The useful question is not what one reported address did, but where several of them send money. Across all of them, 115 receiving wallets get USDT from four or more different reported addresses. Many are exchanges. Some are not.
`TRZxeXSWnqsJzSt712WYBaxmydxVFBTkP6` received money from 7 reported addresses. Read on its own, it took in 92.7 million USDT from 70 senders between 1 May and 2 July 2025, and passed nearly all of it to three wallets with no public label: 48.0M to TYzyB3X64PpkAXaQ46Mr2pnaiUAWtPXViE, 17.6M to TKLLW7yFdvUUCDeHDs3MTjbGrR1TArRy3f and 16.0M to TPBrDxaepqeUm3WzxCAdWKaggq9qg6kpBV. It has had no activity since.
`TVE1KMVZucBDjoYeBjxbtvcXgDV2k9PYwj` and `TRkHJNBxFpP9waNqGcRmP4R3sNk3VoNKot` were fed by 9 and 7 reported addresses. They were active in exactly the same three weeks, 10 September to 3 October 2023, and both sent their money to the same two wallets, TVVKHDrwid1VW9XrTewjpM2grFbRspv4NS and TVReU4Zz7h7jHwvYkzhT6gnCXwyWV8AccS — together about 6.3M out of 10.7M received. Two collectors working the same window into the same destinations is what one operation looks like on chain.
`TEion5ow2fkZVCw24PjB4cB7h8oHxbDXgB` — itself reported once — took in 57.8M USDT from 1,553 senders in its last 10,000 transfers alone (since August 2025) and is still active; its largest outflow goes to TUXcBqJSUqb62oqtowFZgrohUQCbRyxBgJ. `TJnJeormPeDNLSA5Qo4obXJH4e6H5yw2tW` received from 7 reported addresses, took 12.3M from 1,094 senders since December 2022, is still active, and pays out partly through deposit accounts at one exchange, such as TTHycaY6HJSwd6QnUMHqaKZ3HwfXRVjPuj.
| When (UTC) | From | To | Amount | Tx |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Jun 2025 | TRZxeXSW…FBTkP6 | TYzyB3X6…tPXViE | 500,000 USDT largest transfer to the 48M destination | 6fa17f64…b8207a |
| 3 Jun 2025 | TRZxeXSW…FBTkP6 | TKLLW7yF…ArRy3f | 400,000 USDT largest transfer to the 17.6M destination | e01893df…754bde |
| 28 Sep 2023 | TVE1KMVZ…k9PYwj | TVVKHDrw…spv4NS | 643,575 USDT two collectors, same three weeks, same destination | 00de2e42…c687d1 |
| 29 Sep 2023 | TRkHJNBx…VoNKot | TVVKHDrw…spv4NS | 619,272 USDT two collectors, same three weeks, same destination | 34fab4e0…150d63 |
| 11 Dec 2025 | TEion5ow…xbDXgB | TUXcBqJS…RyxBgJ | 286,123 USDT largest outflow of a 57.8M node | 95dc5be8…3f53cf |
| 29 Mar 2026 | TJnJeorm…5yw2tW | TTHycaY6…RVjPuj | 60,000 USDT payout into an exchange deposit account | 510a7940…a5358e |
Where it leaves
The money from reported addresses exits through 184 exchange deposit accounts. Most belong to a handful of exchanges whose deposit networks we can see but do not name here; others are at Binance, Kraken, Bybit and HitBTC. A deposit account is not the exchange’s own money: it is a customer account, and the customer is identifiable to the exchange.
Four HuionePay addresses received about 1.63 million USDT from reported addresses — 1.17M of it into TMqDrZa5kEebg5wi3W3wusVZ6ZF2w6JczH alone. Huione has been named by US Treasury as a laundering channel for exactly this kind of fraud.
What a report is worth, and what this page does not say
A report is a claim, not a finding. Reports on Chainabuse are anonymous, and some are filed in bulk: 105 reports about one fake trading platform were written to five templates. That is why we counted senders on chain rather than reports. It is also why a single report does not raise an address’s risk score in our system; addresses with many independent reports, or that money from several reports flows into, are where we are working to raise it.
This page names nobody and does not say who controls any wallet. The large nodes are described by what they received and from whom. Exchange hot wallets reported by mistake are not listed. The full address-level data is going to our risk team so the reported addresses can be checked against the incident database.
Sources: Chainabuse public reports (pig butchering, romance and fake-returns categories), read 30 September 2026; USDT transfers on Tron from TronGrid, read 30 September – 1 October 2026 (Tether contract TR7NHqjeKQxGTCi8q8ZY4pL8otSzgjLj6t only; approvals and duplicates removed); address labels from PublicAML. Node figures are from up to 10,000 transfers per wallet. This is an information resource about transactions between addresses, not financial or legal advice, and it names no individual as responsible for anything.